Appeal No. 1999-0259 Application 08/596,857 respect to independent claims 1, 10, and 16. Appellants’ dependent claims 2-3, 13 and 17-18, the patentability of which were not argued separately, stand with the independent claims. In re Sernaker, 702 F.2d 989, 991, 217 USPQ 1, 3 (Fed. Cir. 1983). In view of the foregoing, we conclude that the Examiner has not established a prima facie case of unpatentability under 35 U.S.C. § 103 and therefore find the rejection of claims 1-3, 10, 13, and 16-18 improper. Accordingly, we reverse the Examiner’s decision. REVERSED MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT JOSEPH RUGGIERO ) APPEALS AND Administrative Patent Judge ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) LANCE BARRY ) 15Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007