Ex Parte PETTERSSON et al - Page 3



            Appeal No. 2000-2109                                                                         
            Application No. 09/159,609                                                                   

            Buti et al. (Buti)                   5,382,832                Jan. 17, 1995                  
            Temple et al. (Temple)               5,654,226                Aug.  5, 1997                  
            Kim, Y. et al. "Epitaxial Integrated dE1-dE2 Silicon Detectors."                             
            Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research, Vol. 226                                
            (1984), pp 125-128.                                                                          
                                        Rejections at Issue                                              
                  Claims 1, 2, 4 through 6 and 9 stand rejected under                                    
            35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Husimi, Temple and                                
            Buti.                                                                                        
                  Claims 1, 2, 4 through 6, 8 and 9 stand rejected under                                 
            35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Meuleman, Temple and                              
            Buti.                                                                                        
                  Claims 10, 12 through 14 and 17 through 20 stand rejected                              
            under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Husimi, Temple,                             
            Buti and Kim.                                                                                
                  Claims 10, 12 through 14 and 16 through 20 stand rejected                              
            under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Meuleman,                                   
            Temple, Buti and Kim.                                                                        
                  Rather than repeat the arguments of Appellants or the                                  
            Examiner, we make reference to the Brief1 and the Answer for the                             
            respective details thereof.                                                                  

                  1 Appellants filed an Appeal Brief on April 17, 2000.                                  
                                                   3                                                     




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007