Appeal No. 2001-2568
Application No. 09/178,848
In view of the above, we reverse the rejections.
II. The rejection of claims 2 through 8 and 10
through 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over
Fogelson in view of Liou and further in view of Ohsawa.
In light of the fact that we reversed the rejection of
claims 1 and 9 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable
over Fogelson in view of Liou, we also reverse this
rejection because Ohsawa does not cure the aforementioned
deficiencies of Fogelson in view of Liou.
III. Conclusion
Each of the art rejections is reversed.
REVERSED
)
PETER F. KRATZ )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
CATHERINE TIMM )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
BEVERLY A. PAWLIKOWSKI )
Administrative Patent Judge )
8
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007