Appeal No. 2001-2584 Page 9 Application No. 08/462,817 In re Soll, 97 F.2d 623, 38 USPQ 189 (CCPA 1938); In re Wahlforss, 117 F.21 270, 48 USPQ 397 (CCPA 1941), “[i]t appears to be well settled that a single species can rarely, if ever, afford support for a generic claim.” On the surface, by quoting this particular section from Clarke, it would appear that the examiner is concerned that appellants have not provided evidence of a sufficient number of species to represent a genus. This is, however, inconsistent with the examiner’s position (Answer, page 10), that Green can only be antedated by showing that [a]pplicant[s], prior to the publication of Green et al., had reduced to practice the now- claimed genus, or a species of the now-claimed genus which would have rendered the species described by Green et al. to have been obvious. … [T]he novelty of the instant invention is found in the “exogenous DNA” encoding the “steroid receptor protein. Applicant has failed to explain how the reduction to practice of an isolated cDNA encoding a human glucocorticoid receptor would have rendered obvious the isolated cDNA encoding the estrogen receptor of Green et al. The inconsistency in the examiner’s position is highlighted by appellants’ response (Reply Brief, bridging paragraph, pages 8-9), where with reference to In re Tanczyn, 347 F.2d 830, 146 USPQ 298 (CCPA 1965); In re Wakefield, 422 F.2d 897, 164 USPQ 636 (CCPA 1970); and The Manual of Patent Examining Procedure (MPEP), appellants argue: [A] 37 CFR 1.131 affidavit or declaration must establish possession of either the whole invention claimed or something falling within the claim (such as a species of a claimed genus), in the sense that the claim as a whole reads on it. … If the affidavit contains facts showing a completion of the invention commensurate with the claims and as shown in the reference, the affidavit or declaration is sufficient, whether or not it is a showing of the identical disclosure of the reference.Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007