Ex Parte JIA et al - Page 2




         Appeal No. 2002-0142                                                       
         Application No. 09/248,957                                 Page 2          


              1.  A flip-flop for asynchronous set and reset, comprising:           
              a first stage for inputting a differential set of data                
         inputs and generating a differential set of outputs;                       
              a set and reset second stage for receiving said set of                
         differential set of outputs from said first stage and to output a          
         differential set of outputs including a Q signal and a Q signal            
         from said set and reset second stage, wherein said signal Q and            
         signal Q have equal delay times.                                           
              8.  A flip-flop for asynchronous set and reset, comprising:           
              a first stage for inputting a differential set of data                
         inputs and generating a differential set of outputs, said outputs          
         being a set signal and a reset signal;                                     
              a set and reset second stage for receiving said set of                
         differential set of outputs from said first stage and to output a          
         differential set of outputs including a Q signal and a Q signal            
         from said set and reset second stage; and                                  
              a circuit to provide asynchronous operation of said set and           
         reset signals and to prevent short circuit connection when Set             
         and Clear 1are asserted.                                                   

              The prior art reference of record relied upon by the                  
         examiner in rejecting the appealed claims is:                              
         Sato                     5,532,634                July 2, 1996             

              Claims 1-8 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being           
         anticipated by Sato.                                                       


              1 Although we find no clear antecedent basis for "Set and Clear, because
         the metes and bounds of the claim are readily understandable, we consider this
         to be a formal matter that can be addressed by the examiner subsequent to the
         appeal.                                                                    







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007