Ex Parte CHOI - Page 16




            Appeal No. 2002-2015                                                  Page 16              
            Application No. 09/232,138                                                                 


            35 U.S.C. 102(b) as anticipated by Bajorek.  Beginning with claim                          
            6, Bajorek discloses a hard disk drive (col. 2, line 31)                                   
            comprising a main control board 51 (See figure 7 and col. 3,                               
            lines 23-25) and a plurality of head disk assemblies 50 (col. 3,                           
            lines 23 and 24).  Each of the head disk assemblies is connected                           
            by connectors (pins 44, col. 3, lines 17-22) to the main control                           
            board 51, which connects the clustered drives to the system                                
            through the edge connector 52 (col. 3, lines 26 and 27).  Each of                          
            the head disk assemblies contains at least one controller 40, 41                           
            (col. 3, lines 6-8).  Turning to claim 7, each head disk assembly                          
            50 contains a plurality of disks for storing magnetized data and                           
            a corresponding plurality of heads for reading and writing data                            
            to and from the disks (col. 2, lines 38-40 and 58).  With regard                           
            to claim 8, Bajorek discloses that the electronic functions of                             
            the disk drive are controlled by components 40 and 41 which are                            
            mounted on base 10 which in turn is mounted on control board 51                            
            (col. 3, lines 6-8).                                                                       
                                             CONCLUSION                                                
                  To summarize, the decision of the examiner to reject claims                          
            1-3, 6-11, 15, 16, 18, and 19 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) is                                  










Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007