Ex Parte OHTA et al - Page 2



          Appeal No. 2002-1474                                       Page 2           
          Application No. 09/002,927                                                  

                                     BACKGROUND                                       
               Appellants' invention relates to a vehicle information                 
          display device.  An understanding of the invention can be derived           
          from a reading of exemplary claim 1, which is reproduced as                 
          follows:                                                                    
               1. A vehicle information display apparatus which comprises:            
               a vehicle information receiving means for receiving vehicle            
          information indicating a condition other than vehicle position,             
          said vehicle information receiving means operable to receive said           
          vehicle information in the form of image data,                              
               a present position detecting means for detecting the present           
          position of a driver’s own vehicle,                                         
               a display means for displaying information, and                        
               a control means which is so adapted that when the vehicle              
          information receiving means receive a vehicle information in the            
          form of image data, the vehicle information in the form of image            
          data is displayed, and the present position of the driver’s own             
          vehicle is displayed in the form of characters or a present                 
          position indicating mark on a displayed map.                                
               The prior art references of record relied upon by the                  
          examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:                              
          Liebesny et al.              5,131,020             Jul. 14, 1992            
          (Liebesny)                                                                  
          Furuya                       5,257,023             Oct. 26, 1993            
                                                                                     
          Nanba et al.                 5,874,905             Feb. 23, 1999            
          (Nanba)                                     (filed Aug. 4, 1996)            
               Claims 1-14 and 18-27 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103             
          as being unpatentable over Furuya in view of Liebesny.                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007