The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE __________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES __________ Ex parte, MARK D. FRANK, JERIMY NELSON, and NATHAN BERTRAND __________ Appeal 2006-3123 Application 10/368,789 Technology Center 2800 __________ Decided: February 16, 2007 __________ Before JAMES D. THOMAS, MAHSHID D. SAADAT, and ALLEN R. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judges. MACDONALD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-6, 8-10, 16, 17, and 19-21. We note that the Examiner has indicated that claims 11-14 and 18 stand objected to and would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all thePage: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013