The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte HARRY LIU, LONNY BERG, WILLIAM L. LARSON, SHAOPING LI, THEODORE ZHU, and JOEL DREWES _____________ Appeal 2006-3363 Application 10/873,363 Technology Center 2800 ______________ Decided: September 26, 2007 _______________ Before JAMES D. THOMAS, JOSEPH F. RUGGIERO, and ROBERT E. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judges. NAPPI, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 of the final rejection of claims 1 through 6. For the reasons stated infra, we affirm the Examiner’s rejection of these claims.Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013