Ex Parte Liu et al - Page 2

            Appeal 2006-3363                                                                                 
            Application 10/873,363                                                                           

                                               INVENTION                                                     
                   The invention is directed to a method of making magneto-resistive bits                    
            where the bits are protected against later process steps that could damage                       
            unprotected bits.  The method provides protection by encapsulating the bit with a                
            etch stop barrier to cover the top and side walls of the bit.  See page 3 of                     
            Appellants’ Specification.  Claim 1 is representative of the invention and                       
            reproduced below:                                                                                
                         1. A passivated magneto-resistive bit structure, comprising:                        
                         a magneto-resistive bit having a top surface and side walls;                        
                         a conductive etch stop barrier layer encapsulating the top surface and              
                   side walls of said bit; and                                                               
                         a metal contact provided upon at least part of said etch stop barrier               
                   layer.                                                                                    
                                               REFERENCE                                                     
                   The reference relied upon by the Examiner is:                                             
                         Tehrani  US 5,861,328  Jan. 19, 1999                                                
                                          REJECTION AT ISSUE                                                 
                   Claims 1 through 6 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being                       
            anticipated by Tehrani.  The Examiner’s rejection is set forth on page 4 of the                  
            Answer.                                                                                          
                   Throughout the opinion, we make reference to the Brief and Reply Brief                    
            (filed March 3, 2006 and June 6, 2006 respectively), and the Answer (mailed April                
            6, 2006) for the respective details thereof.                                                     

                                                     2                                                       


Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013