Ex Parte Zasloff et al - Page 13


              Appeal No. 2007-0055                                                               Page 13                 
              Application No. 10/053,299                                                                                 

              one amino acid that is able to partly achieve Zeng’s goal of treating vaginitis. While such                
              a composition might only be partially effective, as we have construed claim 1, blocking                    
              adherence of as few as one microbe would satisfy the claim limitation.                                     
                     The Examiner points out (Answer 15) that Zeng teaches that the total content of                     
              amino acids in a composition is “preferably is 30-350 mmol/L.”  Zeng, column 5, lines 3-                   
              4.  When isoleucine is the only amino acid in the composition, it would be present in an                   
              amount of 0.393%,4 which falls within the ranges described (e.g., specification, page 18,                  
              line 13) and claimed (e.g., claims 11-13) in the application as effective.  Accordingly,                   
              because Zeng’s concentration of isoleucine falls within the disclosed and claimed                          
              effective concentrations, we find it reasonable to have presumed that Zeng’s                               
              composition would block microbial adherence as required by claim 1.                                        
                     Appellants argue that Zeng’s composition comprises amino acids to be used as                        
              neutralizing agents.  Br. 27.  We understand Appellants’ characterization of Zeng’s                        
              composition as a “neutralizing agent” to refer to the amino acid’s activity in reducing                    
              acid production (which occurs by interfering with the metabolic processes of bacteria,                     
              not by actually “neutralizing” its activity as implied by Appellants).  Zeng, column 3, lines              
              45-47.  Appellants have not explained why the existence of this acid reducing activity                     
              would foreclose isoleucine from blocking microbial adherence to a eukaryotic cell                          
              surface.  Accordingly, we do not find merit in their argument.                                             
                     We have considered Appellants’ evidence of “unexpected results,” but do not                         
              consider it adequate to rebut the prima facie case for the reasons set forth by the                        

                                                                                                                         
              4 One mole of isoleucine is about 131 grams.  The Merck Index 883 (1996).  30 mmol/1 liter is equivalent   
              to 3.93 grams in 1000 ml or 0.393 grams in 100 ml which is about 0.393% by weight of isoleucine.           




Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013