Ex Parte Ackerman et al - Page 18


                  Appeal 2007-0687                                                                                         
                  Application 10/797,422                                                                                   
             1           The rejection of claims 26 and 36 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                               
             2    unpatentable over the combination of Spence, Hasz, and Ceramics and                                      
             3    Glasses is affirmed.                                                                                     
             4           The rejection of claims 32 and 38 under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being                               
             5    unpatentable over the combination of Rigney, Spence, and Hasz is affirmed.                               
             6           No time period for taking any subsequent action in connection with                                
             7    this appeal may be extended under 37 C.F.R. § 1.136(a) (2006).                                           
             8                                                                                                             
             9                                        AFFIRMED                                                             









                  smt                                                                                                      













                                                            18                                                             

Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: September 9, 2013