The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte CARY LEE BATES and PAUL REUBEN DAY
__________
Appeal 2007-1775
Application 09/749,106
Technology Center 2600
__________
Decided: September 19, 2007
__________
Before JOHN C. MARTIN, JOSEPH L. DIXON, and
ST. JOHN COURTENAY III, Administrative Patent Judges.
COURTENAY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a) from the
Examiner’s rejection of claims 1-4 and 6-31.1 We have jurisdiction under
35 U.S.C. § 6(b). We AFFIRM.
1 The Examiner has indicated that claim 5 would be allowable if rewritten in
independent form (Answer 8).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013