The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte WARREN M. FARNWORTH and JERRY M. BROOKS ____________ Appeal 2007-2503 Application 10/225,978 Technology Center 2800 ____________ Decided: September 21, 2007 ____________ Before ADRIENE LEPIANE HANLON, JAMESON LEE, and MICHAEL P. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judges. TIERNEY, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a 35 U.S.C. § 134 appeal in the above-referenced case1 of claims 1, 3-22, 24-40, 42-47 and 75-89, the only claims pending in this application. We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6(b). 1 The real party in interest is Micron Technology, Inc. (Br. 2).Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013