1 The opinion in support of the decision being entered today is not binding precedent
2 of the Board.
3
4 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
5 ___________
6
7 BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
8 AND INTERFERENCES
9 ___________
10
11 Ex parte IMADDIN OTHMAN ALBASS and LEV MIRLAS
12 ___________
13
14 Appeal 2007-2533
15 Application 09/972,434
16 Technology Center 3600
17 ___________
18
19 Decided: July 31, 2007
20 ___________
21
22 Before WILLIAM F. PATE, III, JENNIFER D. BAHR, and
22 ANTON W. FETTING, Administrative Patent Judges.
23
24 FETTING, Administrative Patent Judge.
25 DECISION ON APPEAL
26
27
28
29 STATEMENT OF CASE
30 Imaddin Othman Albass and Lev Mirlas (Appellants) seek review under
31 35 U.S.C. § 134 of a Final rejection of claims 1-20, the only claims pending in the
32 application on appeal.
33 We have jurisdiction over the appeal pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 6.
34
35 We AFFIRM.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: September 9, 2013