15
NATO during his term of transfer. A continuing relationship
existed between petitioner and NATO during the years in issue.
NATO authorities dictated the results that petitioner was to
accomplish through his work, as well as the means by which he was
to attain those results. NATO retained the right to control the
order and sequence of the tasks that petitioner performed.
NATO's personnel regulations set forth various details concerning
employment, including work hours, holidays, and rights concerning
leave.
NATO's personnel regulations required the organization to
provide insurance coverage to appropriately compensate staff
members and their families for physical injuries suffered as a
result of the performance of NATO duties. As an international
staff member, petitioner was also entitled to, and did receive,
certain educational allowances that were paid directly by NATO.
The stipulated record in this case does not reveal the exact
amounts paid to him.
A staff member could be separated from NATO due to the
expiration of the term of contract, resignation by the member,
age limitation, death, dismissal, or termination by the head of a
NATO body. Termination could result if a staff member did not
perform satisfactorily; became incapacitated; if the country from
which he were a national ceased to be a member of NATO, or
withdrew or failed to renew a security clearance; or due to
disciplinary action.
Page: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011