William H. Adair and Patricia Adair - Page 17

                                                  17                                                    
            allowances he received as part of the total foreign earned income                           
            reflected on the form.  Petitioner included a total figure for                              
            the allowances he received in 1989 and 1990 in the space beside                             
            the description for such allowances and described some allowances                           
            as tax exempt; therefore, he did not include these amounts as                               
            part of the total foreign earned income.  Petitioner reflected                              
            the home leave allowance as taxable in the only year it was                                 
            received.  He reported the NATO education allowances as tax-                                
            exempt in 1 year and as part of his foreign earned income in 2                              
            other years.  Petitioner consistently determined that the costs                             
            of living, overseas differential, and the quarters allowances                               
            were foreign earned income for all 3 years.  Consequently,                                  
            petitioner reported foreign earned income for the years 1988,                               
            1989, and 1990 totaling $96,585.59, $71,241.36, and $78,628.21,                             
            respectively, before applying the limitations of section                                    
            911(b)(2)(A).  On his returns, petitioner claimed exclusions from                           
            income of $83,486.54, $65,100, and $70,000 for the years 1988,                              
            1989, and 1990, respectively.  For each year, petitioner                                    
            consistently reported that his employer was the "NATO                                       
            International Staff."                                                                       
                  Respondent's notice of deficiency determined that petitioner                          
            was not entitled to the total amounts claimed as section 911                                
            exclusions because the salary petitioner received from the DOA                              
            was not qualified foreign earned income.                                                    






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011