- 56 - the greatest percentages of responses to prospect mailings. Also, contrary to the usual experience with prospect mailings, some sweeps packages produced substantial profits. Although the sweeps packages were often profitable for petitioner, they had their drawbacks. Sweeps packages generally worked on individuals who were primarily interested in playing the contest, as opposed to being interested in supporting petitioner. In his memorandum dated July 9, 1986, to petitioner’s executive director, Watson, in generally commenting on petitioner’s direct mail campaign, made the following observations about the sweeps package donors who contributed to petitioner: UCC basically has two donor files--one being sweepstakes donors and the other being regular or straight donors. The Sweepstakes file makes up 80% of all donor names and the straight file has the balance of 20%. Although sweeps names have a higher conversion rate into second and third donations, the life span of these donors is less than straight donors. We are continuing to try to expand the straight file which is a true donor base and is the one that can be tapped for future major gifts. * * * * * * * * * * In summary, it appears that the UCC direct mail fundraising program is healthy and shows signs of continued improvement. As the straight donor file expands, it should lend stability to the monthly income for UCC. The sweepstakes housefile mailings should continue to provide the buffer needed to provide the minimum revenues to help UCC make its monthly budgetary commitments. In addition to the problem that Watson noted, some of thePage: Previous 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011