Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al - Page 278




                                       - 70 -                                         

               adapted the SubChapter S principles on the strength of                 
               his advise [sic].                                                      
               Charles Kozak is an attorney here in town who was at                   
               one time a shareholder in one of our SubChapter S                      
               Leasing Companies and also a participant in other                      
               programs.  He did some legal work for us in the mid-70s                
               in chasing a dead-beat by the name of Feliciano and he                 
               obtained judgement for us.  He became an adversary                     
               after he had made no lease payments on a car which we                  
               had leased to him which compelled us to repossess the                  
               car.  He was delinquent by more than one year.  He has                 
               stirret [sic] up trouble for me ever since.                            
               These three characters now conspired with McWade to                    
               initiate criminal proceedings again against me and, as                 
               you will read, already discussed among themselves how                  
               to divide the "finders fee" (more precisely the Judas                  
               ducats) which they expected to receive from IRS.  As we                
               took Alexanders [sic] testimony this week it became                    
               apparent to Kozak that he had acted unethically and he                 
               read a statement into the records that "he had advised                 
               his client (Alexander) not to engage in reporting me to                
               the IRS in order to extract from me a settlement of his                
               claims" which, of course, is self-defeating since he                   
               was an active participant in the scheme.                               
               I have reason to believe that all of this led nowhere.                 
               If even entrapment and subsequent raid on our premises                 
               did not yield the evidence for the CID characters to                   
               take me out of circulation the Kozak / Alexander /                     
               Matsumoto / McWade conspiracy had no prospect of                       
               success.  More than a year has gone by since these rats                
               tried to make money by setting me up for execution.                    
               I will assume that this incident will become a piece                   
               of the mosaic which should be made known to the US Tax                 
               Court Judge in support of my contention that IRS and                   
               it's [sic] representatives have conspired to ruin my                   
               business and inflict harm on me personally, one way or                 
               another.                                                               
               Following the arbitration hearing, Mr. Moseley filed a                 
          complaint with the Supreme Court of the State of Hawaii, Office             
          of Disciplinary Counsel (HODC), accusing Mr. Kozak of conflict of           
          interest and of attempting to extort money from Mr. Kersting in a           
          civil suit.  On March 17, 1988, Mr. Kozak submitted a written               

Page:  Previous  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011