Jerry and Patricia A. Dixon, et al - Page 274




                                       - 66 -                                         

          and Michael Provan35) and that he knew the Kersting programs and            
          how to locate Mr. Kersting's assets.36  On June 2, 1987,                    
          Mr. Huestis agreed to send a copy of the Thompson file to                   
          Mr. Kozak.  On the same date, Mr. Huestis notified Mr. Yamada               
          that the Thompsons did not plan to retain the Chanin firm to                
          bring suit against Mr. Kersting.                                            
               Messrs. Bigelow, Provan, and Thompson all asked Mr. Kozak to           
          investigate the filing of a lawsuit against Mr. Kersting.  On               
          August 6, 1987, Mr. Kozak wrote to Mr. Thompson and suggested               
          that there was a good chance of obtaining a large judgment                  
          against Mr. Kersting through a class action lawsuit, but that               
          collection of any such judgment would be uncertain.  In addition,           
          Mr. Kozak's letter states in pertinent part:                                
                    As you know, Kersting is now embroiled with the                   
               IRS on behalf of his clients.  I recently had a                        
               conference with Ken McWade, local counsel for the IRS.                 
               He tells me the trial of these cases will be no sooner                 
               than late Spring 1988.  I suspect 12-18 months is a                    
               more realistic date.  Also McWade stated he is 100%                    
               sure Kersting will be unable to show any "purposive"                   
               function of his corporations other than to avoid taxes.                
               Several witnesses including yourself are available to                  
               McWade to prove Kersting never had any intention of                    
               enforcing the notes he had his clients execute.  Also,                 
               I am suspicious that Kersting's representation that his                

          35  Mr. Kozak had represented Mr. Provan when he had been                   
          sued as a director of First Savings.  The representation ended              
          with a settlement with the company that provided First Savings'             
          officers and directors liability insurance.  Mr. Kozak did not              
          represent Mr. Provan in any tax controversies with the Internal             
          Revenue Service related to the Kersting programs.                           
          36  As discussed in greater detail, infra pp. 115-116,                      
          Mr. Kozak and his wife, Susan K. Kozak, had participated in one             
          or more of the Kersting programs that were the subject of this              
          Court's opinion in Pike v. Commissioner, 78 T.C. 822 (1982).                

Page:  Previous  56  57  58  59  60  61  62  63  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011