United Parcel Service of America - Page 100




                                       - 85 -                                         

               Pursuant to tariff provision 510, filing of claims, shippers           
          were required to allege in writing, among other things, that                
          petitioner was liable for the loss or damage.  Pursuant to tariff           
          provision 520, time limit for filing claims, petitioner was                 
          relieved of liability under its tariff if the shipper did not               
          file a claim with petitioner or institute a lawsuit against                 
          petitioner within 2 years and 1 day from when petitioner notified           
          the shipper that the claim had been disallowed by petitioner.               
          Under this provision, shippers were required to bring an action             
          against petitioner in order to pursue their claims for damage or            
          loss of packages.  Each of the above-mentioned provisions existed           
          in petitioner's tariffs before and during 1984.  On the basis of            
          Federal law and the provisions that remained in petitioner's                
          tariffs, liability continued to arise under such tariffs in 1984.           
               Petitioner treated liability for loss or damages associated            
          with EVC's as arising from petitioner's tariffs in accordance               
          with Federal law.  Upon commencement of a relationship with its             
          shippers, petitioner provided most shippers with a copy of                  
          petitioner's service explanation.  While the service explanation            
          referred to NUF and the Shippers Interest contract, petitioner              
          did not generally provide a copy of the Shippers Interest                   


               41(...continued)                                                       
          petitioner would in any event have remained liable to its                   
          shippers for damage claims.                                                 





Page:  Previous  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011