United Parcel Service of America - Page 103




                                       - 88 -                                         

          petitioner's liability for package losses related to any single             
          occurrence to the extent the liabilities were greater than                  
          $25,000 but did not exceed $10 million.  Thus, there was a                  
          theoretical exposure for NUF and OPL, to the extent that one or             
          more loss occurrences resulted in more than $10 million in loss             
          per occurrence.  For example, if petitioner incurred liability to           
          shippers as a result of a single occurrence of three times the              
          $10 million limit that petitioner was insured for under the AFM             
          policy in 1984, NUF/OPL would have been liable for approximately            
          $20 million.44  (Twenty million dollars in additional claims                
          would have reduced the gross profit percentage from EVC's in 1984           
          from 78 percent to 58 percent.)  Even in this unlikely event,               
          excess value revenue in 1984 would have exceeded over two times             
          the amount of claims paid.  Considering the extreme magnitude of            
          a catastrophe that would have to occur before claims exceeded               
          excess value revenue in a given year, we again find it                      
          unrealistic that petitioner or NUF/OPL would realize a loss in              
          its excess value activity.45                                                


               43(...continued)                                                       
          liability to $25,000 per package.                                           
               44Disregarding the $25,000 deductible, petitioner would have           
          coverage of $10 million under the AFM policy, and NUF/OPL would             
          be liable for claims in excess of that.                                     
               45The only potential financial benefit that petitioner could           
          realize from its arrangement with NUF and OPL was if liabilities            
                                                             (continued...)           




Page:  Previous  78  79  80  81  82  83  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011