Alan Robert Zinsmeister - Page 10




                                       - 10 -                                         
          the court-ordered maintenance payments of $1,400 per month for              
          the first 6 months of that year, plus the reduced amount of $500            
          per month for the last 6 months.  The disallowed alimony,                   
          totaling $33,619.68, consisted of petitioner’s 8 months of                  
          payments on the second mortgage at $529.96, plus the $29,380                
          amount petitioner used to pay off the balance of the second                 
          mortgage in August 1996.                                                    
                                       OPINION                                        
               The issue in this case is whether certain payments made by             
          petitioner pursuant to the court orders and decrees in his                  
          divorce proceeding are "alimony or separate maintenance payments"           
          as defined in section 71.  If so, they are deductible by                    
          petitioner in the year paid.  See secs. 71(a), 215(a).  Alimony             
          does not include any part of a payment which the terms of the               
          divorce instrument fix as a sum payable for the support of the              
          children of the payer spouse.  See sec. 71(c).                              
               Congress amended section 71 in the Deficit Reduction Act of            
          1984, Pub. L. 98-369, sec. 422(a), 98 Stat. 795.  The                       
         purpose behind the amendment was to define more precisely the                
         payments that would constitute alimony, deductible by the payor.             
         See H. Rept. 98-432 (part 2) at 1495 (1984), which provides:                 
              The committee believes that a uniform Federal standard                  
              should be set forth to determine what constitutes                       
              alimony for Federal tax purposes.  This will make it                    
              easier for the Internal Revenue Service, the parties to                 
              a divorce, and the courts to apply the rules to the                     
              facts in any particular case * * *                                      





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011