Alan Robert Zinsmeister - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
         received income under the general principle of Old Colony Trust              
         Co. v. Commissioner, 279 U.S. 716 (1929) (payment by a third                 
         party of a person’s legal obligation is taxable income to that               
         person).  Accordingly, in such cases, one-half of the mortgage               
         payment is includable in the gross income of the payee spouse                
         and, to the extent it otherwise qualifies as alimony, it is                  
         deductible by the payor spouse as alimony.  See Taylor v.                    
         Commissioner, 45 T.C. 120, 123-124 (1965); Simpson v.                        
         Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1999-251; Zampini v. Commissioner, T.C.             
         Memo. 1991-395; Rev. Rul. 67-420, 1967-2 C.B. 63; see also sec.              
         1.71-1T(b), Q&A-6, Temporary Income Tax Regs., 49 Fed. Reg. 34455            
         (Aug. 31, 1984).                                                             
              Applying those principles here, we hold that petitioner may             
         deduct as alimony one-half the payments on the first mortgage                
         that he made in 1994 pursuant to the orders of the State court.              
         Petitioner’s reimbursement to Betty in 1994 of the 1993 real                 
         estate taxes and home insurance premiums produces the same                   
         result; one half of those amounts were for the benefit of Betty,             
         who, in 1993, held title jointly with petitioner.  Those amounts             
         also constitute alimony paid by petitioner in 1994.  See                     
         Leventhal v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-92.                               
              The other payments at issue in 1994, 1995, and 1996 all                 
         consist of petitioner’s court-ordered payments upon the second               
         mortgage.  Petitioner alone was liable on the note securing the              






Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011