Alan Robert Zinsmeister - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
         ground that they do not satisfy the requirement that "there is no            
         liability to make any such payment for any period after the death            
         of the payee spouse".  Sec. 71(b)(1)(D).  Accordingly, respondent            
         concludes, these payments are not alimony.  We agree with                    
         respondent insofar as the attorney’s fees are concerned;                     
         otherwise, we disagree.                                                      
              In the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Congress imposed the              
         requirement that alimony payments must relate solely to periods              
         before the death of the payee.  See section 71(b)(1)(D), as                  
         amended by the Deficit Reduction Act of 1984, Pub. L. 98-369,                
         sec. 422(a), 98 Stat. 795.  Under that Act, the provision that               
         alimony payments terminate with the payee’s death was required to            
         be set forth in the divorce or separation agreement.  In 1986,               
         however, Congress removed the requirement that the termination-              
         at-death provision be specifically set forth in the divorce or               
         separation agreement.  See Tax Reform Act of 1986, Pub. L. 99-               
         514, sec. 1843(b), 100 Stat. 2853.  Thus, payments now qualify as            
         long as termination would occur automatically under State law.               
              In section 71(b)(1)(D), Congress recognized that payments               
         would operate to support and maintain the payee only if they                 
         related to periods before her death, and that payments for                   
         periods after her death obviously would not provide such support.            
         The relevant legislative history explains:                                   
                   In order to prevent the deduction of amounts which                 
              are in effect transfers of property unrelated to the                    





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011