Joseph B. Campbell - Page 17




                                       - 17 -                                         
          The only question, therefore, is whether there has been a “change           
          in the legal climate” since the decision in Campbell I.                     
          Commissioner v. Sunnen, supra at 606.                                       
               Petitioner has not referenced, and we cannot find, any                 
          relevant change in the applicable law that warrants a second                
          analysis of petitioner’s case.  Although the IGRA was amended               
          after the decision in Campbell I, none of the amendments are                
          relevant to the issue presented.13  Notably, petitioner does not            
          argue that any specific amendment to the IGRA would have had any            



               13The first amendment to the IGRA was the addition of 25               
          U.S.C. sec. 2717a as part of the Department of the Interior and             
          Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1990, Pub. L. 101-121, 103             
          Stat. 701, 718, current version at 25 U.S.C. sec. 2717a (Supp.              
          2000), which provides that, in fiscal year 1990 and thereafter,             
          fees to be collected pursuant to 25 U.S.C. sec. 2717 (Supp. 2000)           
          shall be available to carry out the duties of the National Indian           
          Gaming Commission (NIGC).  The Technical Amendments to Various              
          Indian Laws Act of 1991, Pub. L. 102-238, sec. 2(a) and (b), 105            
          Stat. 1908, current version at 25 U.S.C. sec. 2703(E) and (F)               
          (Supp. 2000), added subpars. (E) and (F) to 25 U.S.C. sec. 2703             
          and added provisions to 25 U.S.C. sec. 2718 authorizing                     
          appropriation of necessary funds for operation of the NIGC for              
          fiscal years beginning Oct. 1, 1991 and 1992.  In 1992, the                 
          Federal Indian Statutes:  Technical Amendments, Pub. L. 102-497,            
          sec. 16, 106 Stat. 3255, 3261 (1992), current version at 25                 
          U.S.C. sec. 2703 (Supp. 2000), struck out the words “or Montana”            
          following the word “Wisconsin” in 25 U.S.C. sec. 2703(7)(E).  In            
          1997, the Department of the Interior and Related Agencies                   
          Appropriations Act, 1998, Pub. L. 105-83, sec. 123(a) and (b),              
          111 Stat. 1543, 1566, current version at 25 U.S.C. secs. 2717 and           
          2718 (Supp. 2000), made minor changes to the wording of 25 U.S.C.           
          sec. 2717(a)(1) and (2), made minor wording amendments to 25                
          U.S.C. sec. 2718(a), and rewrote 25 U.S.C. sec. 2718(b).  In                
          addition, the Department of Commerce, Justice, and State, the               
          Judiciary, and Related Agencies Appropriations Act, 1998, Pub. L.           
          105-119, sec. 627, 111 Stat. 2440, 2522, current version at 25              
          U.S.C. sec. 2718 (Supp. 2000), rewrote 25 U.S.C. sec. 2718(a).              





Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011