- 2 - Respondent determined a $3,656 deficiency in petitioner’s 1997 Federal income tax; this determination is based on respondent’s disallowance of petitioner’s claim for an earned income credit. Thus, the ultimate issue we must decide is whether petitioner is entitled to the claimed earned income credit, which in turn depends upon whether the so-called tie-breaker rule under section 32(c)(1)(C) is applicable. In resolving this latter question, we must decide whether the retroactive application of amended section 32(c)(3)(A) in 1998 is constitutional. Background The stipulation of facts and the attached exhibits are incorporated herein. The stipulated facts are hereby found. Petitioner resided in Saratoga, New York, at the time she filed her petition. During the entire year in issue (1997), petitioner was unmarried and resided with: John Pancake, her boyfriend; Christina and Mitchell Sutherland, her children from a prior marriage; and Alyssa Pancake, the daughter of Mr. Pancake and petitioner. Each child was under the age of 19. Petitioner, Mr. Pancake, and the three children lived together as a family unit. In fact, Mr. Pancake cared for Christina and Mitchell as if they were his own children. Petitioner and Mr. Pancake shared the costs of food and lodging for the entire household.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011