Edward A. Robinson III and Diana R. Robinson - Page 120




                                        - 94 -                                         
          interest on tax deficiencies arising from a sole proprietorship              
          are not within personal interest because the previous sentence               
          excepted that class of interest from “personal interest”.  If the            
          conference committee intended all interest on deficiencies to be             
          included in personal interest, then the conference committee                 
          could have left the word “generally” out of the last sentence, so            
          that personal interest would cover all interest on deficiencies.             
               The majority holds that the Conference Committee Report is              
          not clear and accordingly justifies its reliance on the Joint                
          Committee on Taxation General Explanation of the Tax Reform Act              
          of 1986, pp. 262-264, 266, published May 4, 1987 (Blue Book).                
          Majority op. p. 35.  The majority argues that the confusion is               
          further exacerbated because the Blue Book provides that interest             
          on a tax deficiency relating to a sole proprietorship is                     
          considered personal interest.  The majority goes too far in                  
          rejecting the Conference Committee Report in favor of the Blue               
          Book.                                                                        
               In upholding the validity of section 1.163-9T(b)(2)(i)(A),              
          Temporary Income Tax Regs., supra, and refusing to follow Redlark            
          v. Commissioner, 106 T.C. 31 (1996), the majority provides:                  
                    As applied to the instant case, section 1.163-                     
               9T(b)(2)(I)(A), Temporary Income Tax Regs., supra, treats               
               petitioners’ payment of interest as nondeductible “personal             
               interest”.  The text of section 163(h)(2)(A) does not compel            
               this result.  The relevant legislative history, however,                
               lends some support to this interpretation of the statute.               
               [Majority op. pp. 47-48.]                                               






Page:  Previous  84  85  86  87  88  89  90  91  92  93  94  95  96  97  98  99  100  101  102  103  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011