Ruthe G. Ohrman - Page 7

                                        - 7 -                                         
               On April 15, 2000, petitioner and Mr. Ohrman filed a joint             
          1999 Federal income tax return (joint 1999 return), Form 1040,              
          U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, and attachments.  Petitioner             
          prepared the joint 1999 return on her home computer using Turbo             
          Tax, a tax preparation program.  Although two Forms 1099-R,                 
          Distributions From Pensions, Annuities, Retirement or Profit-               
          Sharing Plans, IRAs, Insurance Contracts, etc., for 1999 were               
          sent to Mr. Ohrman at the Birdshill residence--one indicating a             
          gross distribution and taxable amount of $71,000 from the Dean              
          Witter account and the other indicating a gross distribution and            
          taxable amount of $8,000 from the Dean Witter account–-the                  
          $79,000 in distributions withdrawn by Mr. Ohrman from his Dean              
          Witter account was not reported on the joint 1999 return filed by           
          petitioner and Mr. Ohrman.                                                  
               The $79,000 withdrawn by Mr. Ohrman from the Dean Witter               
          account was taxable income, the omission of which from the joint            
          1999 return resulted in an understatement of tax attributable to            
          an erroneous item of Mr. Ohrman.  At the time petitioner signed             
          the joint 1999 return, she did not have actual knowledge of the             
          early distributions from the Dean Witter account.                           
               On May 29, 2001, respondent issued a letter of proposed                
          changes to petitioner’s and Mr. Ohrman’s reported tax liability             
          for 1999.  This letter proposed that petitioner and Mr. Ohrman              
          owed an additional $42,927 (consisting of $32,217 in deficiency,            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011