City of Santa Rosa, California - Page 17

                                        - 17 -                                         
          general public has no bearing on Company’s private business use              
          of that property.                                                            
               The sewage ratepayers’ use of the pipeline is based on                  
          removing and ultimately disposing of their sewage and is also                
          based on their residence within the service area of the sewage               
          system.  There are no specially negotiated rate arrangements with            
          the sewage ratepayers for the disposal of their sewage.  See sec.            
          1.141-3(c)(2), Income Tax Regs.  Ordinances set uniform and                  
          standardized sewer rates and connection fees for all users in the            
          service area of the sewage system.  The sewage disposal functions            
          of petitioner’s sewage system are available for general public               
          use.  We hold that the sewage ratepayers’ use of the pipeline                
          constitutes general public use.                                              
               3.  Use of the Pipeline                                                 
               Respondent’s determination considered three users and two               
          different uses of the financed pipeline:                                     
               The City Project is used by Company, the irrigators,                    
               and the ratepayers.  Use of the City Project by the                     
               ratepayers is based on removing and ultimately                          
               disposing of their sewage.  In contrast, use of the                     
               City Project by the Company and the irrigators is based                 
               on supplying the wastewater for use in the geyser field                 
               or on irrigable property.                                               
                                                                                      
          He relies solely on Company’s purported use of the financed                  
          pipeline and concludes that such use is a private business use of            
          more than 10 percent of the proceeds of the bond issue.  For the             
          reasons stated below, we disagree.                                           






Page:  Previous  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011