City of Santa Rosa, California - Page 10

                                        - 10 -                                         
          private activity bond which is not a qualified bond (within the              
          meaning of section 141).”  Sec. 103(b)(1).  We must determine in             
          the instant case whether the bonds that petitioner proposes to               
          issue are private activity bonds.11  The parties stipulated that             
          the bonds will not be qualified bonds.  See sec. 141(e).                     
               The term “private activity bond” means any bond that is part            
          of an issue which meets:  (1) The private business use test of               
          section 141(b)(1) and the private security or payment test of                
          section 141(b)(2), or (2) which meets the private loan financing             
          test of section 141(c).  Sec. 141(a).  The parties agree that the            
          only issue in the instant case is whether the proposed bonds meet            
          the private business use test and the private security or payment            
          test (collectively the private business tests).  If the private              
          business tests are met, the bonds are private activity bonds.                
          See sec. 141(a)(1); City of New York v. Commissioner, 103 T.C.               



               11Under sec. 7478, the Tax Court shall have jurisdiction, in            
          a case of actual controversy involving a determination by the                
          Secretary, to make a declaration whether interest on proposed                
          bonds will be excludable from gross income under sec. 103(a).                
          The burden of proof is on petitioner as to the grounds set forth             
          in respondent’s notice of determination and is on respondent as              
          to any ground upon which he relies and which is not stated in the            
          notice of determination.  Rule 217(c)(2)(A) and (B); City of New             
          York v. Commissioner, 103 T.C. 481, 482 (1994), affd. 70 F.3d 142            
          (D.C. Cir. 1995).  Our decision in this case is based upon the               
          administrative record and the stipulation of facts.  Rule 217(a);            
          City of New York v. Commissioner, supra at 482.  We assume that              
          the facts represented in the administrative record and in the                
          stipulations are true.  Rule 217(b)(1); City of New York v.                  
          Commissioner, supra at 482.                                                  




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011