City of Santa Rosa, California - Page 20

                                        - 20 -                                         
          statements in the Staff of Joint Comm. on Taxation, General                  
          Explanation of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, at 1152 (J. Comm.                 
          Print 1987), which discuss the reasons for the enactment of the              
          private business use test:                                                   
               Congress believed that * * * [the] diversion of                         
               governmental bond proceeds to nongovernmental users                     
               should be limited, but without setting the threshold                    
               amount so low that de minimis or incidental usage of                    
               government facilities and services by private users                     
               might cause interest on an issue to be taxable.                         
               [Emphasis added.]                                                       
               In response to petitioner’s contentions respondent argues               
          that “A legitimate governmental purpose cannot negate                        
          impermissible private business use.”  He suggests that uses of a             
          bond-financed facility that are incidental to its governmental               
          purpose are taken into account under the private business use                
          test and that neither the Code nor the regulations provides a                
          general exception for incidental use.  He argues that the                    
          references to the terms “incidental” and “de minimis” in the                 
          General Explanation, which petitioner relies upon, “simply refer             
          to amounts of private business use that fall below the statutory             
          threshold established by Congress”; i.e., private business use               
          which is less than 10 percent of the proceeds of an issue of                 
          bonds.                                                                       
               First, we agree with respondent that neither the Code nor               
          the regulations provide a general exception for incidental use of            
          proceeds or financed property, except for the 10-percent                     






Page:  Previous  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011