City of Santa Rosa, California - Page 19

                                        - 19 -                                         
          wastewater begins after the pipeline’s disposal process is                   
          complete.  Disposal of wastewater is petitioner’s only purpose               
          for constructing the pipeline.  We cannot agree that Company’s               
          use of what respondent terms “Wastewater”, and suggests is waste,            
          involves a use of the financed pipeline when petitioner’s sole               
          purpose for constructing the pipeline was to dispose of the                  
          wastewater.  Company simply provides petitioner with a place in              
          which to dispose of a certain amount of wastewater in an                     
          environmentally acceptable manner and, in turn, gets rights to               
          that wastewater.  In the circumstances of this case, Company’s               
          role in the disposal of the wastewater does not translate into a             
          use of the sewage facilities.                                                
               Petitioner contends that, regardless of whether Company’s               
          use of the wastewater can be construed semantically as some use              
          of the pipeline, any such use of the pipeline is not a private               
          business use because taking the wastewater from the pipeline is              
          incidental to the governmental sewage treatment and disposal                 
          purpose of that facility.17  Petitioner relies upon the following            


               17Petitioner claims that from its perspective, “it is                   
          irrelevant who takes the Treated Water and what they do with it              
          so long as the Treated Water is used in an environmentally sound             
          manner in accordance with applicable law and relevant public                 
          policy.”  Petitioner adds that if it could accomplish its                    
          governmental purpose of sewage treatment and disposal by simply              
          emptying the wastewater into a lake or pit at the top of the                 
          mountain, the cost of the pipeline would be the same and the                 
          sewage ratepayers would still be paying increased rates for the              
          disposal of the wastewater.                                                  





Page:  Previous  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011