THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion (1) was not written for publication and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 16
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte RODNEY A. MATTISON
____________
Appeal No. 95-2218
Application 07/902,073
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FINDINGS OF FACT
We have reviewed the record in its entirety in light of the
arguments of Appellant and the examiner. Our decision presumes
familiarity with the entire record. A preponderance of the
evidence of record supports each of the following fact findings.
A. The nature of the case
1. This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 12-17. (Paper 13.) Appellant has canceled
claims 1-11 and 18. (Paper 8 at 2.) The examiner has allowed
claims 19-29. (Paper 9 at 1.) We reverse the rejection of
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007