THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 33
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte RAYMOND M. WARNER JR.,
RONALD D. SCHRIMPE
and ALFONS TUSZYNSKI
_____________
Appeal No. 95-2440
Application 07/705,7261
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before WEIFFENBACH, PAK and THIERSTEIN, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed May 24, 1991. According to
appellants, this application is a division of Application
07/443,175 filed November 30, 1989, now U.S. Patent No.
5,089,826 granted February 18, 1992, which is a continuation-
in-part of Application 06/861,708 filed May 12, 1986, now U.S.
Patent No. 4,885,615 granted December 5, 1989, which is a
continuation-in-part of Application 06/799,652 filed November
19, 1985, now U.S. Patent No. 4,794,443 granted December 27,
1988.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007