THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 43
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM VAN LOO, JOHN WATKINS,
ROBERT GARNER, WILLIAM JOY, JOSEPH MORAN,
WILLIAM SHANNON, and RAY CHENG
____________
Appeal No. 95-4714
Application No. 08/046,4761
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before MARTIN, FLEMING, and BARRETT, Administrative Patent
Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the final rejection of claims 13, 14,
and 17-27, all of appellants' pending claims, as unpatentable
under 35 U.S.C. § 103. We reverse and enter new grounds of
rejection against claims 13 and 14.
We note that inasmuch as appellants' reply brief was refused
1Application for patent filed April 13, 1993, which is
identified as a continuation of Application 07/603,248, filed
October 24, 1990 (now abandoned), which is identified as a
continuation of Application 07/104,280, filed October 2, 1987
(now abandoned).
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007