THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte DAVID A. GOUGH
and
JOSEPH Y. LUCISANO
__________
Appeal No. 96-0251
Application 07/874,6971
___________
ON BRIEF
___________
Before PAK, ELLIS and OWENS, Administrative Patent Judges.
OWENS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal from the examiner’s final rejection of
claims 1-14, which are all of the claims in the application.
1Application for patent filed April 28, 1992. According
to the appellants, the application is a continuation-in-part
of Application 07/450,852, filed December 14, 1989, abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007