Ex parte BRYG et al. - Page 3




           Appeal No. 1997-0708                                                                     
           Application 08/196,618                                                                   

                 at least one of said modules having an associated cache                            
                 memory for storing cache contents therein, comprising:                             
                       a cache address tag associated with each cache for                           
                 indicating said cache contents status;                                             
                       a bus interface associated with each module for                              
                 receiving requests to check cache coherency, and for                               
                 forwarding said requests to said cache; said bus                                   
                 interface forwarding a first, read-only request to said                            
                 cache, followed by a second read-write request that is                             
                 forwarded to said cache if and only if said first                                  
                 read-only request indicates that said cache address tag                            
                 matches an address of said request to check cache                                  
                 coherency and said request to check cache coherency                                
                 requires said cache to be modified as a result of any of                           
                 invalidation, copying out, or changing from clean to                               
                 shared status; and                                                                 
                       each module including a lock for interrupting access                         
                 to said cache only during a read-only request and a                                
                 subsequent read-write request pursuant to a cache                                  
                 coherency check.                                                                   

                 The Examiner relies on the following prior art:                                    
                 Thacker                 5,136,700              August 4, 1992                      

                 Claims 1, 2, 4-7, 9, and 10 stand rejected under                                   
           35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Thacker.                                      
                 We refer to the Final Rejection (Paper No. 7) (pages                               
           referred to as "FR__") and the Examiner's Answer (Paper                                  
           No. 14) (pages referred to as "EA__") for a statement of the                             
           Examiner's position and to the Corrected Appeal Brief filed                              

                                               - 3 -                                                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007