Appeal No. 1997-0708 Application 08/196,618 In summary, the Examiner has failed to establish a prima facie case of obviousness with respect to the limitations of (1) performing a "first[] read-only request" followed by a "second read-write request" in response to a "request to check cache coherency," and (2) a "lock for interrupting access." Therefore, the rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-7, 9, and 10 is reversed. REVERSED LEE E. BARRETT ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT MICHAEL R. FLEMING ) APPEALS Administrative Patent Judge ) AND ) INTERFERENCES ) ) ) ERIC FRAHM ) Administrative Patent Judge ) - 11 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007