Ex parte AZUMA et al. - Page 4




          Appeal No. 1998-0129                                       Page 4           
          Application No. 08/438,062                                                  


          to make in the briefs have not been considered.  See 37 CFR                 
          1.192(a).                                                                   


                                       OPINION                                        


               In reaching our decision in this appeal, we have                       
          carefully considered the subject matter on appeal, the                      
          rejections advanced by the examiner, and the evidence of                    
          obviousness relied upon by the examiner as support for the                  
          rejections.  We have, likewise, reviewed and taken into                     
          consideration, in reaching our decision, the appellants'                    
          arguments set forth in the briefs along with the examiner's                 
          rationale in support of the rejections and arguments in                     
          rebuttal set forth in the examiner's answer.  As a consequence              
          of our review, we make the determinations which follow.                     
               In rejecting claims under 35 U.S.C. § 103, it is                       
          incumbent upon the examiner to establish a factual basis to                 
          support the legal conclusion of obviousness.  See In re Fine,               
          837 F.2d 1071, 1073, 5 USPQ2d 1596, 1598 (Fed. Cir. 1988).  In              
          so doing, the examiner is expected to make the factual                      









Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007