Ex parte AZUMA et al. - Page 13




          Appeal No. 1998-0129                                      Page 13           
          Application No. 08/438,062                                                  


          product of the year award to Matsushita, but that Symetrix                  
          Corporation participated in the development of the chip.”                   
               We find that the Araujo Declaration (page 2, paragraph 5)              
          states that                                                                 
               The claims of the present application are                              
               directed to the method of making the very same chips                   
               that received the Okouchi Award shown in Exhibit A.                    
               The claimed method imparts to the devices the                          
               reduced power dissipation and downsizing that                          
               justified the award.  Features of the claims that                      
               impart these improvements include the specific                         
               sequence of layering steps followed by the                             
               deposition of a liquid precursor and a carefully                       
               controlled anneal.                                                     

          We note that the method of manufacturing the capacitor                      
          incorporating BST is not claimed.  Appellants do not claim a                
          specific sequence of layering steps, nor a carefully                        
          controlled anneal process.  Appellants assert (reply brief,                 
          page 11) that the claimed method referred to in the Araujo                  
          Declaration included claim 8 of the related 08/214,401                      
          application.  Our review of the claim language provided by                  
          appellants does not reveal any language regarding a carefully               
          controlled anneal process as stated in the Araujo Declaration.              
          From the evidence before us, manufacturing process aspects of               
          the claimed method, other than the steps of claim 8, may have               







Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007