Interference No. 103,878
As we understand the junior party’s motion, the
junior party is seeking to have its own testimony suppressed 5
to the extent that it is relied upon by the senior party. The
reason given for justifying suppression with respect to the
cross- examination of the junior party’s declarants is that
senior party “did not specifically identify the cited portions
[of the cross- examination transcripts he was relying upon] or
submit copies thereof during the senior party’s testimony
period.” Likewise with respect to the junior party’s
declarations, as we understand
the junior party’s motion, the senior party failed to identify
during the preliminary motion period what portions of the
junior
party’s declarations he was relying on in opposition to the
motion for judgment. Similarly, the junior party further
states that the senior party did not, during the senior
5Specifically, the junior party’s motion seeks
suppression of the junior party’s declarations of declarants
Wilkerson, Brammer, Myers, Henson, and Milling, and cross-
examination deposition testimony of these witnesses at JR36-
JR258. This comprises the balance of the junior party’s
record.
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007