The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written for
publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 23
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte JOSEPH F. KRANTZ
____________
Appeal No. 1997-2242
Application No. 08/084,370
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before BARRETT, RUGGIERO, and LEVY, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEVY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from
the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1-3, which are all of
the claims pending in this application.
BACKGROUND
The appellant's invention relates to a method of
reorganizing the data on a RAID-4 or RAID-5 array in the
absence of a disk. An understanding of the invention can be
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007