Ex parte SCHANK et al. - Page 1




                   The opinion in support of the decision being entered               
                        today was not written for publication and                     
                          is not binding precedent of the Board.                      

                                                            Paper No. 27              
                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                    _____________                                     
                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                   
                                    _____________                                     
                 Ex parte RICHARD L. SCHANK, WILLIAM W. LIMBURG and                   
                                   DALE S. RENFER                                     
                                    _____________                                     
                                Appeal No. 1998-0847                                  
                             Application No. 08/483,762                               
                                   ______________                                     
                                      ON BRIEF                                        
                                   _______________                                    
          Before GARRIS, WALTZ and DELMENDO,  Administrative Patent                   
          Judges.                                                                     
          WALTZ, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         

          DECISION ON APPEAL                                                          
               This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134                  
          from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 through 4, 6                
          through 10, 12 through 16 and 22.   The remaining claims in1                                          
          this                                                                        

               Appellants’ amendment to claims 13 and 15 filed subsequent to the final1                                                                     
          rejection was entered by the examiner (see the amendment dated Mar. 20, 1997,
          Paper No. 13, entered as per the Advisory Action dated Apr. 8, 1997, Paper No.
          14).                                                                        
                                          1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007