Ex parte SCHANK et al. - Page 6




          Appeal No. 1998-0847                                                        
          Application No. 08/483,762                                                  


          member in the form of a drum, nor use of the imaging member                 
          with a cleaning blade (Brief, page 4).  Appellants’ argument                
          is not well taken since the examiner finds that Pai discloses               
          that the charge transport layer is placed contiguously on a                 
          charge generating layer which in turn is on a support (Answer,              
          page 4).  Pai specifically teaches that this support or                     
          substrate may include drums (col. 3, ll. 11-12).  Furthermore,              
          in view of the teachings of Borsenberger that “[d]rums are                  
          widely used for low-volume copiers and printers” (page 6) and               
          “[l]ow-volume copiers usually                                               
          use metal or polymeric blades [for photoreceptor cleaning]”                 
          (page                                                                       





          16), it would have been well within the ordinary skill of one               
          in the art to use cleaning blades with the drum imaging member              
          of Pai.                                                                     
               Appellants argue that none of the applied references                   
          address the problem of “squeak” nor offer a solution to this                
          problem (Brief, pages 5-6).  As noted by the examiner (Answer,              
                                          6                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007