The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not
written for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte SUDHIR MADAN
_____________
Appeal No. 1999-1631
Application 08/733,5861
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before MARTIN, GROSS, and DIXON, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 2, and 4-15, all of
the pending claims, under 35 U.S.C. §§ 112 and 102.
We affirm-in-part and reverse-in-part.
A. The invention
1Application for patent filed October 18, 1996.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007