Ex parte MADAN - Page 4




                 Appeal No. 1999-1631                                                                                                                   
                 Application 08/733,586                                                                                                                 

                 equals (xn1+xn2)/2 (Specification at 6, ll. 19-26).  The                                                                               
                 difference between the two means can be in the range from the                                                                          
                 minimum feature size of a given technology (e.g., 0.5 microns)                                                                         
                 up to one-half the width of the cell (id. at 6, l. 26 to p. 7,                                                                         
                 l. 1).                                                                                                                                 
                 B.  The claims                                                                                                                         
                          The independent claims, i.e., claims 1, 5, and 10, read                                                                       
                 as follows:2                                                                                                                           
                                   1.  A static random access memory (SRAM) cell                                                                        
                          comprising:                                                                                                                   
                                   a pair of cross-coupled inverters, a first of                                                                        
                          said inverters comprising a first p-channel pull-up                                                                           
                          transistor and a first n-channel pull-down                                                                                    
                          transistor, a second of said inverters comprising a                                                                           
                          second p-channel pull-up transistor and a second n-                                                                           
                          channel pull-down transistor, wherein a gate of said                                                                          
                          first p-channel pull-up transistor is offset from a                                                                           
                          gate of the first n-channel pull-down transistor in                                                                           
                          the same horizontal direction as a gate of the                                                                                
                          second p-channel pull-up transistor is offset from a                                                                          
                          gate of the second n-channel pull-down transistor,                                                                            
                          and said n-channel pull-down transistors are                                                                                  
                          laterally aligned;                                                                                                            
                                   a pair of bitlines extending in a vertical                                                                           
                          direction; and                                                                                                                

                          2In Claim 10 as reproduced in the Appendix to the Brief,                                                                      
                 line 2 incorrectly includes the term "gate" after "transistor"                                                                         
                 (first occurrence).  The examiner also correctly notes (Answer                                                                         
                 at 3) that dependent claim 6 is incorrectly reproduced in that                                                                         
                 Appendix -- the value "0.25" should read "0.5."                                                                                        
                                                                       - 4 -                                                                            





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007