The opinion in support of the decision being entered today was not written
for publication and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 20
____________
____________
Ex parte NOBUKAZU KAWAGOE, YUICHI KAWAKAMI,
KYOKO NAKAMURA, and YASUHISA KINTO
____________
Appeal No. 2000-0431
Application No. 08/789,127
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, KRASS, and BARRY, Administrative Patent Judges.
BARRY, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
The examiner rejects claims 1-25 and 29-32. The appellants
appeal therefrom under 35 U.S.C. § 134(a). We affirm-in-part and
enter a new ground of rejection.
BACKGROUND
The invention at issue in this appeal relates to moving a
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007