Appeal No. 2001-0651 Application 08/134,187 A copy of representative claims 1, 10, 26, 61, 73 and 341, as found in the Appendix to appellants’ brief, is attached to this decision. The prior art references of record relied upon by the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are: Copley 867 Apr. 2, 1861 Beinbrech 4,087,570 May 2, 1978 Bradshaw 4,263,734 Apr. 28, 1981 Prinz et al. (Prinz) 4,527,969 Jul. 9, 1985 Fabbiani 4,889,366 Dec. 26, 1989 Claims 1 through 5, 10, 31 through 35, 40, 73, 109, 341 through 348 and 350 through 354 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Copley in view of Bradshaw. Claims 6, 36 and 349 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Copley in view of Bradshaw as applied above, and further in view of Beinbrech. Claims 7 through 9 and 37 through 39 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Copley in view of Bradshaw as applied above, and further in view of appellants’ 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007