Appeal No. 2001-0651
Application 08/134,187
admitted prior art (AAPA) found in the specification at page 4,
line 9 through page 5, line 9.
Claims 26, 56, 92 and 128 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Copley in view of Bradshaw
and Fabbiani.
Claims 61 through 65, 71, 97 through 101 and 107 stand
rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over
Copley in view of Bradshaw as applied above, and further in view
of Prinz.
Claims 66, 72, 102 and 108 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103(a) as being unpatentable over Copley in view of Bradshaw
and Prinz as applied above, and further in view of Beinbrech.
Claims 67 through 69 and 103 through 105 stand rejected
under 35 U.S.C. § 103(a) as being unpatentable over Copley in
view of Bradshaw and Prinz as applied above, and further in view
of AAPA.
4
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007